So most people know the story of orphaned teenager Peter Parker, aka Spider-Man, right? He gets bitten by an unusual spider and develops unusual super-spidey senses and powers that he initially uses to avenge the killing of his uncle, but then realizes that with great power comes greater responsibility, and so he adjusts his perspective and uses his spider power to fight crime and make the world a better place. Yeah – nothing new with this flick in that regard. And as expected, it’s a great action film and very well done and it is highly recommended. You will not be disappointed.
Andrew Garfield in The Amazing Spider-Man, Courtesy of Beyond Hollywood
So when you make a summer blockbuster movie about a well-known character and story, and you do this only 10 years after it was just successfully done (and followed by two sequels), and these films were extremely popular, well – you have to expect comparisons galore. But I’m not going to compare Andrew Garfield to Tobey Maguire as Spider-man. (Garfield does an excellent job and really brings out the teen angst better, plays it a little darker, albeit without little trace of humor or fun.) And I won’t compare leading ladies Emma Stone and Kirsten Dunst. (Emma Stone’s Gwen Stacy is brainier and more sophisticated – no whiny, narcissistic, starving actress here – although one can get the impression that Gwen would most likely NOT give Peter Parker the time of day – but of course, we are glad she does.)
Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone in The Amazing Spider-Man, Courtesy of Madiana
I’m not going to compare the way Peter Parker gets bit by a spider and how he discovers – then comes to grips – with his new powers. (Thankfully THIS Peter Parker uses this power against the school bully and not as a pro wrestler.) Or how one Peter Parker shoots organic webs that come from within his wrists, while this Peter Parker magically creates mechanical web devices that he wears. (Although both are hard to swallow, I’d have to opt for the organic version.) Or how they both strike out in revenge against the killer of Uncle Ben. (Both films benefited from having extremely talented top-notch Oscar-winning veteran actors – oh wait, Martin Sheen has never even been nominated…WHAT??? A travesty . . . No clear win in this category . . . )
Sally Field, Martin Sheen, and Andrew Garfield in The Amazing Spider-Man, Courtesy of Screen Rant
This time around we get to know Peter Parker a little better and deeper before he becomes Spider-Man. Some might say this makes for a slow start, but I preferred getting to know the teenager first and appreciated this aspect. We get better back story on our villain, too, (Dr. Curt Connors played by Rhys Ifans), who does a Jekyll/Hyde turn and becomes the Lizard. The CG for this character seemed a bit over-the-top, but I got used to it quick enough, and after all, that is what is expected in a summer blockbuster, right? I missed the character of The Daily Bugle editor J. Jonah Jameson, who to me seems intrinsic for the full development of Peter Parker. Maybe he’ll show up in subsequent films in this series. On a positive note, I liked the vulnerability of this Peter Parker: he bruises and bleeds, and does so quite often actually.
Rhys Ifans in The Amazing Spider-Man, Courtesy of Film Drunk
In summary: The Amazing Spider-Man has great action, fantastic special effects, a strong storyline with compelling characters, and lots of big, loud moments to keep us on the edges of our seats. Sounds like a summer blockbuster to me – and The Amazing Spider-Man is just that. But I still have to wonder if all this was necessary so soon after the last one . . . ah, forget all that and go enjoy this fun film. Is it better? I am not sure I would say that – but I would say it is pretty comparable.
Andrew Garfield in The Amazing Spider-Man, Courtesy of Film Equals
Christian Worldview
The Amazing Spider-Man is rated PG-13 because of lots of action and violence, including over-the-top fighting; scary falls and suspensions from high places; and the killing of Uncle Ben, although this scene is not too graphic. Language is clean (some typical teenager attitude issues), and the adult situations are kept to a minimum and low-key. There are two scenes of deep-kissing, and one instance where Peter Parker accidentally pulls a woman’s blouse off that is stuck to his new spider sticky grip – yes, it is an accident – and leaves her riding the subway in only her jeans and bra. This scene is played for laughs and not really exploitive. I took my 8-year-old to the film and I am totally fine with that decision.
Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone in The Amazing Spider-Man, Courtesy of Slate
Watch the Official Movie Trailer THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN
Featured photo credits: Andrew Garfield in The Amazing Spider-Man, Courtesy of NME.com
To learn more about the author of this review, visit Dale Ward
Leave a Reply